|
The Pueblo County Board of County Commissioners voted 3-0 on March
18, 2009, to approve a 1041 land-use permit for the Southern Delivery
System with its staff recommended terms and conditions. On April
14, 2009, the Colorado Springs City Council voted 8-1 in favor of
a resolution to formally recognize the commitments in the terms
and conditions of the Pueblo County 1041 land-use permit, preserving
our ability to construct the SDS Preferred Alternative – a
pipeline from Pueblo Reservoir.
The following documents contain the proposed terms and conditions,
mitigation requirements and two memoranda of understanding related
to the project:
Details of the Pueblo County 1041 Permit
Conditions
Following is a high level summary of the Pueblo County proposed
conditions. Colorado Springs, acting in the capacity of project
manager for SDS, would be required to:
Mitigation of Fountain Creek Impacts
| • |
Mitigate impacts to Fountain Creek from SDS
by funding $50 million to the new Fountain Creek Watershed,
Flood Control and Greenway District (District) or similar entity
for erosion, sedimentation, flood control or water quality improvement
projects. |
| • |
Payments would be made in five annual installments
after water begins flowing through the SDS pipeline. |
| • |
Of that total, Colorado Springs would pay
$300,000 in equal annual installments of $100,000 each beginning
July 1, 2009, to assist in the identification and prioritization
of projects, and to fund a study or studies of opportunities
for constructing flood control and sediment control facilities
which may include the feasibility of a dam or dams on Fountain
Creek or its tributaries in order to improve flood protection
for the Fountain Creek Basin. |
| • |
Colorado Springs Utilities to invest $75
million in planned improvements to its wastewater collection
system or reuse systems by Dec. 31, 2024 to protect against
future spills, increase its opportunities for reuse, and mitigate
possible water quality impacts from SDS. |
| • |
Reduce sediment load in lower Fountain Creek
prior to SDS construction by dredging and sediment-collection.
|
Stormwater Management
| • |
Maintain stormwater controls and other regulations
intended to ensure that Fountain Creek peak flows resulting
from new development served by the SDS project within the Fountain
Creek basin are no greater than existing conditions. This requirement
can only apply to Project Participants who have the legal authority
to regulate in this manner. |
Protection of the Arkansas River/Pueblo Reservoir
| • |
SDS participants would continue participation
in the Pueblo Flow Management Program to protect Arkansas River
flows below Pueblo Dam for recreation and the Arkansas River
Corridor Legacy Project. |
| • |
· Colorado Springs Utilities to work
with the Pueblo Board of Water Works to outline how the two
cities will maintain a storage pool in Pueblo Reservoir to permit
the release of water into the Arkansas River during times when
the flow in the river could fall to dangerously low levels –
at or below 50 cubic feet per second (cfs). |
| • |
· Wait to begin construction at or
near Pueblo Reservoir Dam until after the Bureau of Reclamation
performs its dam-safety review and accepts the design construction
plans. |
| • |
· Colorado Springs Utilities would
voluntarily participate in developing a management plan for
Pueblo Reservoir to protect reservoir levels and recreational
opportunities on Pueblo Reservoir to the extent feasible, when
and if the Southeastern Water Conservancy District, Reclamation
and other affected parties agree to develop such a plan. |
Other Water Users
| • |
Colorado Springs could elect to add SDS project
participants if the entities are located in El Paso and Teller
Counties within the Arkansas River Basin and agree to meet criteria
outlined in the conditions. |
Property Owners/Construction
| • |
Treat private property owners fairly, avoid
creating financial burdens for property owners, and use power
of eminent domain “only as a last resort” to acquire
property and easements. |
| • |
Mitigate construction impacts and restore
disturbed lands. |
| • |
Take “substantial steps” within
36 months to “construct the permitted development.” |
City County Review
| • |
The Pueblo Board of County Commissioners
approved the 1041 Permit with conditions, subject to recognition
by the Colorado Springs City Council of the commitments contained
in the terms and conditions. |
Colorado Springs to Review 1041 Permit Conditions
The Pueblo Board of County Commissioners approved the 1041 Permit
with conditions, subject to recognition of the commitments contained
in the terms and conditions.
“The announcement of these conditions is a major step forward
to obtaining a land use permit in Pueblo County,” said SDS
Project Director John Fredell. “But now our community must
carefully review these conditions. With the approval of the 1041
Permit, we are in the good position of having two very good alternatives
to choose from. SDS ensures we will have a dependable and cost effective
way to deliver water to our community.”
A pipeline from Pueblo Dam still appears to be the less expensive
of the two alternatives, although some of the conditions proposed
by Pueblo County will narrow the price difference.
The Pueblo Dam alternative also has the advantage of taking water
from the reservoir, a more stable source of water than taking it
directly from the Arkansas River.
|